On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Jason Schiller <[email protected]> wrote: > I oppose as written, but support the concept.
I do not yet have a clear leaning for/against this version of text, but I too have some concerns. I, too, support the concept. .... > There was some idea in the original policy that this additional burden could > be avoided if the out of region use was only "incidental", yielding this /20 > text. Yeah, I think we got bogged down in the definition of incidental, and "you know it when you see it" does not fly well as a procedure. .... > This proposal seems to go further and suggest that any ARIN space and other > RIR space must be efficiently utilized by ARIN's definition of efficient > utilization. > > > "The report must demonstrate that all resources currently available for use > within the requested service region are efficiently utilized based on > applicable ARIN policy." Depending on the implied ANDs or ORs, that might requirement may only apply to requests for more the /20's. Could someone (staff?) clarify how this would be interpreted? _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
