Present transfer policy will effectively preclude new entrants from
obtaining any IPv4 address space via transfer (unless they can somehow
first get resources allocated from their upstream ISPs during this
time of increasing scarcity), so continued thinking and discussion
on solutions would indeed be prudent.
Thanks!
/John
Yet another reason to support 2014-14, the simple solution to many problems.
2014-14 solves virtually all the problems being presented in the context of
2014-20, does so in verbally economic terms, and contains within it
protections against market manipulations in the form of the limit of a
single /16 transferred needs-free per year per recipient.
No problems with 80% of last versus aggregate, no problems with TPIA, no
problems with slow-start, no problems with MDN, no problems with upstream
scarcity, no problems with section 4 versus section 8. No issues of NRPM
bloat, no need to change section 4, no problems with minimum sizes. Plus it
has the benefit of reducing the gap between legacy and RSA-space rights and
reduces the risk of out-of-policy transfers which detriment Whois accuracy,
and increases the likelihood of Interregional transfers with RIPE. Finally
it allows us to stop with the deck-chair arranging and pay more attention to
IPv6 policy.
Regards
Mike Burns
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
