On Sep 24, 2014, at 10:48 AM, David Huberman <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think John's message, with its new info that speculators call him regularly > to learn the rules, To be clear, I indicated that I've had investment firms ask about the 'rules and regulations' that apply to transfers of IP address rights for this very reason; it is not known if any of them decided to engage in speculation... (Note: I also direct all of them to ARIN's list of transfer facilitators - https://www.arin.net/resources/transfer_listing/facilitator_list.html>, as these folks may have different perspective or insights on the market) > What's the counter argument against 2014-14? Not a counter-argument per se, but just a note that is necessary for the ARIN AC to document why any draft policy enables fair and impartial number resource administration. In the case of 2014-14, this means making clear why a constraint is only applied only to transfer requests of a certain size. That may not be very difficult, but is a requirement that must be met in recommending any policy for adoption. FYI, /John John Curran President and CEO ARIN _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
