On Sep 24, 2014, at 4:33 PM, David Huberman <[email protected]> wrote:
> Owen, > > I understand what you're saying, and I think I agree. I don't understand why > John is saying 'submit a template? because I agree with you that it isn't at > all a policy matter. David - I do not believe that it is a policy matter - Owen suggested that it was implied by NRPM 8.3 policy language (which provides that the recipient and resources must meet ARIN's current policies.). I pointed out that the policy would have to be must clearer to hold the meaning he intends and note the option of a policy proposal. ARIN's IPv4 Countdown Plan is quite similar to the serialization and review of requests that APNIC and RIPE performed as part of their IPv4 pool runout plans, and originated in order to provide for fair treatment of requests from the free pool as we approach runout. Team review of requests (where the entire analyst staff gathers to process the request queue) is not efficient, but does provide benefits for serialization in processing of requests. It is unclear how that would be at all beneficial for IPv4 transfers and it definitely would impact IPv4 transfer processing times. FYI, /John John Curran President and CEO ARIN _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
