On Sep 24, 2014, at 6:26 PM, Owen DeLong <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sep 24, 2014, at 2:03 PM, John Curran <[email protected]> wrote: >> ... >> ARIN's IPv4 Countdown Plan is quite similar to the serialization >> and review of requests that APNIC and RIPE performed as part of >> their IPv4 pool runout plans, and originated in order to provide >> for fair treatment of requests from the free pool as we approach >> runout. Team review of requests (where the entire analyst staff >> gathers to process the request queue) is not efficient, but does >> provide benefits for serialization in processing of requests. It >> is unclear how that would be at all beneficial for IPv4 transfers >> and it definitely would impact IPv4 transfer processing times. > > I doubt it would be beneficial to transfers. However, I don’t think it is > fair for transfers to be expedited and handled faster than free pool requests. > > I believe it is a fairness issue, not an efficiency issue.
Owen - Once the IPv4 free pool is depleted, would you suggest still continuing the team review process for all IPv4 transfers going forward? Thanks! /John John Curran President and CEO ARIN _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
