On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Michael Peddemors <[email protected]> wrote: > However, ARIN does have the mandate regarding proper SWIP for > delegated IP Addresses, and enforcement in that area might be the first step.
Suggest a useful penalty (within ARIN's organizational scope) for the discovery of forged SWIP information. Something a "bulletproof hoster" wouldn't roll his eyes at but that isn't devastating to a business hit with a false positive. Also, suggest a process ARIN might use to distinguish between those who were tricked (i.e. victims) versus those who were complicit. It is, after all, trivial to anonymously buy a pre-paid debit card and forge a fax-quality image of a driver's license. -Bill -- William Herrin ................ [email protected] [email protected] Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/> May I solve your unusual networking challenges?
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
