On 11/10/2014 8:17 AM, Kevin Kargel wrote:
Are you suggesting ARIN start suspending networks with unresponsive POC's?  I 
would have to think hard before supporting that approach.

I would support a proposal that no new resources be issued to any organization 
with an unresponsive 'admin|tech|abuse' POC.


Hi Kevin,

It's already policy.

POCs that are unresponsive are supposed to be marked in the database as
unresponsive.  ARIN is also supposed to further investigate them
and mark them invalid.  That is implied by Section 3.6.1 of the
policy manual

Invalid POCs by definition cannot be used as justification for meeting the numerical requirements for utilization in order to obtain more
addressing.

Is it your view that this process is not happening?  Is ARIN not
making available a list of these invalid POCs via bulk Whois as
the policy requires?

Ted

Kevin


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Michael Peddemors
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2014 9:56 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN IPs and Spammers? =>  Need for Governance

On 14-11-10 07:34 AM, Kevin Kargel wrote:
I have to agree with Ted. ARIN is not in the 'acceptable use enforcement'
business and that is a line that should not be crossed.  There are many other
agencies and venues more appropriate for the task of spam regulation.  ARIN
is not a first amendment police, and they are not responsible for misuse of
member networks.  ARIN's sole job is registration of IP number resources.

I am 100% in favor of limiting and restricting spam and other malicious
internet abuses, but ARIN is not the appropriate agency to assign the onus of
policing these bad actors.  I applaud all the efforts to fight spam and
encourage everyone to become much more active and involved in
combatting it, but please do it from a proper agency.

Kevin

However, ARIN does have the mandate regarding proper SWIP for delegated
IP Addresses, and enforcement in that area might be the first step.

Many of those 'spammers' use forged or false information, and while ARIN is
not the right place to judge the usage of IP(s), it does have the mandate to
determine whether an organization is entitled to new resources.

This is a 'first step' which I believe ARIN needs more support in addressing,
and stronger mandates in this area.

This would help prevent abuse.  Usage of a public resource such as an IP
Address, should have clearly presented, accurate information as to the party
using and responsible for such activity.

Some providers are very forward in this regard, requiring identification of
users/organizations who wish to use their IP resources, and using 'rwhois'
servers and/or SWIP to clearly report this, while others simply ignore ARIN
guidelines, can't be bothered, or turn a blind eye.

It would be helpful to deal with the later in a more effective way, than simply
'taking a  report' of this occurring.

There are many 'can-spam' laws etc, that can address spammers, however if
the information of the operators is false, inaccurate, or missing, that brings
extra challenges.

I believe if the information was more accurate, it would also curb some of
that activity, freeing up IP addresses for better use.




--
"Catch the Magic of Linux..."
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Peddemors, President/CEO LinuxMagic Inc.
Visit us at http://www.linuxmagic.com @linuxmagic
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A Wizard IT Company - For More Info http://www.wizard.ca
"LinuxMagic" a Registered TradeMark of Wizard Tower TechnoServices Ltd.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
604-682-0300 Beautiful British Columbia, Canada

This email and any electronic data contained are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed.
Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely
those of the author and are not intended to represent those of the
company.
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.

_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to