I also oppose. John Santos sums up the big points with which I agree: ----- On Dec 24, 2014, at 1:00 AM, John Santos [email protected] wrote:
> Oppose 2014-14 > > 1) /16 is not "small" Agreed. Even by ARIN definition it is "medium" :-) > 2) The problem the proposal purports to solve hasn't actually been > demonstrated. "ARIN staff [...] is spending scarce staff time on needs > testing of small transfers." Obviously, doing the necessary checking > requires staff time, but is it a significant amount? Is it taking much > longer than it used to? Is it costing ARIN a lot of money in staff > wages and overhead to do these assessments, or is it lost in the noise? I have not heard or seen any data to support the "ARIN staff is too burdened" argument, other than there being a slightly longer processing time for IPv4 requests, which I am completely fine with. IPv6 requests have been pretty speedy for me. -Randy _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
