Thank you John! So Gary: I understand your meta point. I am all for clarity and ease-of-use in the NRPM. As an AC member, I hope to drive the NRPM to more and more “easiness”.
But (and perhaps I’m wrong), I feel that EU v6 policy is pretty needs-free and easy. You have 5 clauses to qualify under, and clause e) really is the ‘catch-all” bucket for “everything else”, including the case you brought up. Disagree? David R Huberman Microsoft Corporation Principal, Global IP Addressing From: John Curran [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 9:09 AM To: David Huberman Cc: Gary T. Giesen; [email protected] Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] IPv6 End-User Initial Assignment Policy (or: Please don't me make do ULA + NAT66) On Feb 17, 2015, at 11:54 AM, David Huberman <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: But “something quite so fuzzy” is your interpretation, not ARIN’s. So let’s get ARIN’s interpretation and try and take the fuzziness out of the equation. Question for ARIN: In the general (normal) case when an application is made for EU v6 under clause e) and there’s a technical explanation for why they want RIR-issued space, will the application be approved ? Yes, so long as a technical explanation is provided. NRPM 6.5.8.1 provides a list of several situations that would warrant direct end-user IPv6 assignment, and others are accepted as well so long as a reasonable technical justification is provided. Thanks, /John John Curran President and CEO ARIN
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
