some argument to make the infrastructure/DC a site as well.
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 6:22 AM, Gary T. Giesen <[email protected]> wrote: > Don't need to. The NRPM defines a site in 2.10 ( > https://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#two10) > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Winters [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: February-18-15 8:47 AM > To: Gary T. Giesen; 'David Huberman'; [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [arin-ppml] IPv6 End-User Initial Assignment Policy (or: Please > don't me make do ULA + NAT66) > > Curious, how do you define a site? > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Gary T. Giesen > Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 4:49 PM > To: 'David Huberman'; [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] IPv6 End-User Initial Assignment Policy (or: Please > don't me make do ULA + NAT66) > > FYI to try to address Bill Herrin's concern, I amended that they be 13 sites > in a contiguous network to try to reduce the probability that there be 13 > separate announcements, although I'm not sure how enforceable such a > provision would be. > > GTG > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of David Huberman > Sent: February-17-15 3:46 PM > To: [email protected]; Gary T. Giesen > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] IPv6 End-User Initial Assignment Policy (or: Please > don't me make do ULA + NAT66) > > Michael, > > Does Gary's concrete suggestion -- adding a qualifier that you can get > approved for IPv6 space if you have 13 more sites, with no other criteria -- > make sense to you? Would you support it? > > Thanks, > David > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 12:42 PM > To: Gary T. Giesen > Cc: David Huberman; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] IPv6 End-User Initial Assignment Policy (or: Please > don't me make do ULA + NAT66) > > > Gary T. Giesen <[email protected]> wrote: > > That's obviously a consideration but I don't want to build an IPv6 > > adoption model for my customers around something quite so fuzzy where > > one customer could be approved and another be denied. I prefer > > something a little more concrete that I can point a customer to an say > > "apply under this" and it's plain to them (and ARIN) that they > qualify. > > I completely hear you. > I've argued repeatedly (back to 2007) that this BS about routing slots is > onsense, and that these kinds of policies are preventing adoption of IPv6 by > small and middle sized enterprises. > > It's just not ARIN's job to protect routing slots. > > I'm not clear if the resulting /40 will be announced at all. > If it will remain internal with IPVPN, and then, with a PI prefix from each > *local* ISP, then you have the classic Non-Connected Network. > > -- > ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks > [ > ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect > [ > ] [email protected] http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails > [ > > > > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public > Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. > > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public > Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. > > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
