On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 5:47 PM, james machado <[email protected]> wrote: > So we argue for a /48 for each home user site but we toss out that > argument when it comes to a smaller business with multiple sites?
Hi James, I'm not sure how you get that from what I wrote below. Would you mind explaining? > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 1:28 PM, William Herrin <[email protected]> wrote: >> Add to section 6.5.8.1: >> >> (f) All end user organizations who do not qualify for addresses under >> (a) through (e) qualify for a direct assignment of exactly one /48. >> This section (f) shall expire upon determination by ARIN staff that >> IPv6 has become the "dominant" network protocol on the public >> Internet. The expiry shall not impact prior assignments made under >> this section. Also a quick nit -- top posting can make public conversation threads like this very hard to follow. I'd encourage you to comment in-line if you can. Thanks, Bill -- William Herrin ................ [email protected] [email protected] Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/> _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
