You are correct, David… We should restore the anti-flip language that prohibits an organization which received a transfer from subsequently being a provider for any transfer within 24 months.
Owen > On May 27, 2015, at 12:38 AM, David Huberman <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> So basically, you'd like to do an end run around the law in China and it >> would >> be oh so helpful if ARIN would cooperate? > > ??? > > For clarity: > > Statement 1: If you acquire a block on the open market and transfer it into > your ARIN account, NRPM 8.4 locks it into ARIN for 2 years. > > Statement 2: If you need to operate in China and get Chinese transit or > peering, Chinese law requires the prefix being announced be registered in > CNNIC. > > Statement 1 was intended to prevent flipping/speculating. > Statement 2 is Chinese internet policy. > > A bad actor gets around Statement 1 by transferring the block to a different > OrgID in ARIN via NRPM 8.2. Once that transfer occurs, the block in the > different OrgID is not subject to Statement 1 . Flipping/speculation can now > occur. > > A good actor has no choice but to get around Statement 1 by transferring the > block to a different OrgID in ARIN via NRPM 8.2, then doing an inter-RIR > transfer to APNIC (and then to CNNIC). BGP can now occur. > > In either case, Statement 1 is no-op. > > > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
