On Jun 3, 2015, at 4:05 PM, Mike Burns <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi John, > > The point remains. You could have argued that no transfer could happen > without ARIN approval.
We argued exactly that, and the language to the contrary was removed by the parties. An address block is transferred when the registry entry is updated; if there is a party that wants ARIN to update the entry contrary to policy, then the party that alleges this “right” must make that argument in court to obtain an order to that effect. > Why would Nortel object? They got their money. See answer to Mr. Herrin earlier regarding significant motivation due to future address blocks to be transferred. > It seems there are these legal rights that exist outside the ARIN registry > system, in particular legacy legal rights which remain untested in court. If that’s the case, then excellent - I look forward to seeing these promptly adjudicated as a result of a party making an appropriate claim to that end. Thanks! /John John Curran President and CEO ARIN _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
