On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 6:59 PM, Scott Leibrand <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:48 PM, William Herrin <[email protected]> wrote: >> > IPv4 transfer recipients must demonstrate (and an officer of the >> > requesting >> > organization must attest) that they will use at least 50% of their >> > aggregate >> > IPv4 addresses (including the requested resources) on an operational >> > network >> > within 24 months. >> >> I'm inclined to support changing the 8.3 recipient conditions >> consistent with this idea but it's not clear to me how this text would >> fit with what's already there. > > > Currently, both 8.3 and 8.4 reference "current ARIN policies" for > demonstrating need ("The recipient must demonstrate the need for up to a > 24-month supply of IP address resources under current ARIN policies"). This > new section 8.1.x would add a new type of policy that would allow > organizations requesting simple 8.3 or 8.4 IPv4 transfers to bypass all the > complexity and detailed utilization reporting requirements of NRPM section > 4.
Ah. In that case, I'm opposed to the policy as written. As a practical matter, the text does not sensibly fit where indicated. If placed there, it would make the surrounding policies harder, not easier, to understand. As a policy matter, I'm virulently opposed to using said criteria for out-region 8.4 transfers. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin ................ [email protected] [email protected] Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/> _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
