> On Aug 27, 2015, at 09:20 , Andrew Dul <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 8/27/2015 4:45 AM, Rudolph Daniel wrote: >> >> "This policy proposal stretches across responsibilities areas as it impacts >> > number policy, ARIN operational practice, and fees." >> >> What would the result of orgs. being allowed to create re assignment >> records, yet failing to do so? Or, what would be their motivation to >> maintain an acceptible level of accuracy? >> > > The way the policy is written so far, additional reassignment records, are > optional. If the community wanted to see end-users add reassignment records > as a requirement, that is a discussion that the community should have and > draft those expectations into policy.
I remain unconvinced that even allowing end user reassignment records is a good idea. However, you are right as to discussing requiring them. However, even if we make them optional, Rudy raises a good and valid point about what is in place to ensure that they remain at all accurate. Owen _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
