On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 7:54 PM, Martin Hannigan <[email protected]> wrote: > Why do we need a policy to undo something that was never a policy in the > first place? What was made up on the fly should be able to undone in the > same manner, especially considering how egregious this proposal is.
Hi Marty, Weak enforcement is not lack of a policy. NRPM 2.2 and functionally identical language have been on the books all the way back to ARIN's formation. There has been a tacit understanding that minor outregion use would not be significantly penalized. On a practical level, outregion use minor enough to disappear in to the rest of your allocation still isn't penalized. You're caught because you made wholesale use (not minor use) of ARIN addresses outregion and with pool depletion ARIN is asking tougher compliance questions. David says, "the time for RIRs being anything other than local language/time/etc is passed." If you agree, global policy changes will be needed to make it happen. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin ................ [email protected] [email protected] Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/> _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
