> On Sep 24, 2015, at 15:41 , John Springer <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Owen, > > On Thu, 24 Sep 2015, Owen DeLong wrote: > >> >>> On Sep 24, 2015, at 12:37 , John Springer <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> And if you have an opinion of no, are you able to say because it is >>> technically unsound or unfair and partial? >> >> This isn?t really necessary, John. A proposal must be fair, technically >> sound, and have support of the community in order to be adopted. >> >> Just because it is technically sound and/or fair does not mean that the >> community must support it. >> >> People are free to reject a policy for any reason, though I admit a bias in >> favor of at least some rationale for rejection. >> >> Owen >> > > Oh, I think it is necessary for the community to comment on all three > criteria, Owen, and I thank you for inviting them to express support or > opposition. > > BTW, do you support or oppose the Draft Policy? > > John Springer
I think comments on all three criteria are welcome. I don’t think anyone in particular is required to comment on any of the areas they don’t choose to. Personally, I think that this policy is unnecessary and contrary to its stated intent as written, but I need to review it more thoroughly to see if I misread something. Owen _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
