OPPOSED How I subdivide and allocate addresses internally and downstream is not a matter for the community to vote on; that's between me and my customers.
Matt On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 1:54 PM, ARIN <[email protected]> wrote: > Draft Policy ARIN-2015-10 > Minimum IPv6 Assignments > > On 17 September 2015 the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) accepted "ARIN-prop-224 > Minimum IPv6 Assignments" as a Draft Policy. > > Draft Policy ARIN-2015-10 is below and can be found at: > https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2015_10.html > > You are encouraged to discuss the merits and your concerns of Draft > Policy 2015-10 on the Public Policy Mailing List. > > The AC will evaluate the discussion in order to assess the conformance > of this draft policy with ARIN's Principles of Internet Number Resource > Policy as stated in the PDP. Specifically, these principles are: > > * Enabling Fair and Impartial Number Resource Administration > * Technically Sound > * Supported by the Community > > The ARIN Policy Development Process (PDP) can be found at: > https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html > > Draft Policies and Proposals under discussion can be found at: > https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/index.html > > Regards, > > Communications and Member Services > American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN) > > > ## * ## > > > Draft Policy ARIN-2015-10 > Minimum IPv6 Assignments > > Date: 23 September 2015 > > Problem Statement: > > ISPs may believe that they have an incentive to obtain smaller blocks than > they really need, and once they receive their allocation may subsequently > issue blocks smaller than their customers may need in the future. This > policy seeks to encourage the correct behavior by reiterating the smallest > reasonable sub-allocation size and by discounting any space which has been > subdivided more finely from any future utilization analysis. > > Policy statement: > > Modify section 2.15 from "When applied to IPv6 policies, the term "provider > assignment unit" shall mean the prefix of the smallest block a given ISP > assigns to end sites (recommended /48)." to "When applied to IPv6 policies, > the term "provider assignment unit" shall mean the prefix of the smallest > block a given ISP assigns to end sites. A /48 is recommended as this > smallest block size. In no case shall a provider assignment unit for the > purpose of this policy be smaller than /56." > > Modify section 2.16.1 from "A provider assignment unit shall be considered > fully utilized when it is assigned to an end-site" to "A provider assignment > unit shall be considered fully utilized when it is assigned in full (or as > part of a larger aggregate) to a single end-site. If a provider assignment > unit (which shall be no smaller than /56) is split and assigned to multiple > end-sites that entire provider assignment unit shall be considered NOT > utilized." > > Comments: > Timetable for implementation: IMMEDIATE > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. > _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
