On Dec 3, 2015, at 9:55 AM, Lu Heng <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi: > > Thanks for quick reply, and sorry about my English ability.Below is what my > understanding to the reply: > > Example 1: > > No, there is no need to notify ARIN simply because change of location.( > provided other fact stay the same) > > Example 2. > > In case of 3 location shrinking to 2 location, there is also no need to > notify ARIN provided the service stay the same.(in-out region does not > relevant here as the number of location is decreased, so even there is an > out region location was notified ARIN during application process in the first > place)
Essentially correct, noting that changes in circumstances may cause review of the already-approved resource request if there is reason to believe that original resource request was fraudulent in nature. This is similar to cases where a party requests resources baed on is own need, is approved, and then undergoes a “change in circumstance” such that they wish to now transfer those resources to another party instead... Thanks! /John John Curran President and CEO ARIN _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
