RE: ARIN-2015-8 4. Should End-Users who want to be able to re-assign records simply be required to become ISPs? --->No. Why should they?
5. Should the ISP/End-User distinction be eliminated (which is a bigger discussion outside the scope of the current problem statement)? ---> No. They are different type of business entities and should be serviced according to their needs. José [email protected] On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Christian Tacit <[email protected]> wrote: > I am writing on behalf of the ARIN AC to seek additional input from the > community regarding how (or if) we should proceed with ARIN-2015-8. > > > > The feedback received at ARIN 36 and in subsequent AC discussions has been > very mixed and there is no community consensus for the proposal in its > present form. > > > > Some of the main points made at ARIN 36 and the subsequent AC meeting were: > > > > 1. Orgs should not be able to by-pass the fee structures and other > policy consequences of being classified as ISPs, and the draft policy would > facilitate this type of by-pass; > > 2. Some of those who shared the concern in point 1. said that they > would still support allowing Orgs to SWIP to themselves (and possibly to > related Orgs) to facilitate geolocation and this will be even more > important in an IPv6 environment where assigned address blocks are much > bigger and so often not used at one location; > > 3. ARIN already allows RWHOIS to be used by End-Users, which leads to > the question of whether this avenue should be foreclosed, End-User SWIPs > should be allowed or the status quo should be left in place; > > 4. Should End-Users who want to be able to re-assign records simply > be required to become ISPs? > > 5. Should the ISP/End-User distinction be eliminated (which is a > bigger discussion outside the scope of the current problem statement)? > > 6. If the ISP/End-User fee distinction were eliminated, would there > still be opposition to the draft policy? > > 7. To what extent is there value or do problems get created if > End-Users can SWIP (i.e., improving the accuracy of database information > vs. possibly facilitating a “grey market” where the true registered users > of numbering resources are not known)? and > > 8. Does the problem statement need to be reformulated, and if so, how? > > > > If you would like to see further work on this policy, please let us at the > AC know what form you think that work should take. If you think the policy > should be abandonded altogether we would like to know that as well. > > > > Thank you. > > > > Chris > > > Christian S. Tacit, > Tacit Law > > P.O. Box 24210 RPO Hazeldean > Kanata, Ontario > K2M 2C3 Canada > > Tel: +1 613 599 5345 > Fax: +1 613 248 5175 > E-mail: [email protected] > > This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to > which it is addressed and may contain information that is subject to > copyright, privileged, confidential, proprietary or exempt from disclosure > under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient or the person > responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are > strictly prohibited from disclosing, distributing, copying or in any way > using this message. If you have received this communication in error, > please notify the sender and destroy or delete copies you may have > received. > > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. >
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
