On Apr 11, 2016, at 5:53 PM, Owen DeLong 
<o...@delong.com<mailto:o...@delong.com>> wrote:
Just to be clear, you feel that ARIN registry policy which rapidly depletes the
lower range of 4-byte ASNs would be technically sound and facilitate fair and
impartial number resource administration?

No. I believe that ARIN registry policy which ignores any previous distinction
between ASNs ≤65535 and ASNs ≥65536 is harmful. I believe that a policy which
makes no distinction and hands them out as if they were a single pool of 32-bit
numbers is in the best interests of the community.

Alas, within the scope of ARIN’s mission, the best interests of the community 
are
met by registry policy which is technically sound and facilitates fair and 
impartial
number resource administration (hence the reason I asked you to elaborate on
those aspects, if any were applicable to your position.)

At some point there will no longer be available ASNs ≤65535. So be it. That
date should neither be accelerated nor decelerated by ARIN policy.

It would be helpful if you could explain how in some detail, given that there
appears to be sufficient number of lower range 4-byte ASNs for those who
require such for their operations, and further that the supply appears to be
sufficient for quite some time (potentially till there is greater acceptance
and far fewer hurdles with the use of higher range 4-byte ASNs…)

So far, I haven’t seen so much a requirement as a convenience request for those
lower numbers.

Understood, however, we have folks who have expressed that higher-range
4-byte ASN’s pose additional technical challenges to their operations, so that
remains an active point of discussion.

If ARIN were to issue AS numbers strictly from smallest to largest, is it your
belief that those who feel they need lower-range AS numbers should engage
in an NRPM 8.3 transfer to obtain such? (or would you also want policy change
to prohibit that as an option?)

Thanks!
/John

John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN


_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to