Jason - David is correct.
Note that we administer the registry per the number resource policy manual, and that includes generally facilitating requestors towards approval if at all possible. The phrase in NRPM 8.2 is simply “reorganization” and this has wide applicability for organizations who need restructure responsibilities with their business units. If the community would like more stringent criteria applied with respect to the nature of “reorganization", it should specify such via explicit policy changes which meet the principles of Internet number resource policy provided in the PDP (i.e. enabling fair and impartial number resource administration, technically sound, supported by the community) Thanks! /John On Jun 1, 2016, at 2:44 PM, David Huberman <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: "The assets using the number resources currently registered to David Corp are now under the control of Jason Corp. David Corp and Jason Corp are both subs of LizAndHeather Corp, as shown in this document here." On Jun 1, 2016, at 10:19 AM, Jason Schiller <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: John, I guess I don't know what is meant by corporate reorganization as referenced in 8.2. I assume this means the corporate structure has changed, for example closing a wholly owned subsidiary, or moving a subsidiary to a parent higher up in the tree. I tried to suggest an example where the corporate structure has not changed. I no longer need IPs for my orgID X, but could use them for my OrgID Y and my OrgID Z. Where X, Y , and Z have always been wholly owned subs, and will continue to be so for the foreseeable future. Or a completely seperate case where X, Y, and Z have always been a single legal entity, and will continue to be so for the foreseeable future. Does "I have pulled the plug on product P so we don't the need the IPs but can use them elsewhere" Or "Product Q stopped growing so I no longer need the unused IP space but can use them elsewhere" qualify as a corporate re-organization and therefor the transfer permitted under 8.2? __Jason On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:27 AM, John Curran <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: On Jun 1, 2016, at 11:02 AM, Jason Schiller <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I can move any IP equal to or larger than the minimum between ARIN OrgIDs as long as the entities registered to the OrgID have either the source or recipient entity owning or controling the other, or both are under common ownership or control? In cases of a reorganization of responsibilities (as you describe above), number resources may be transferred between related organizations in accordance with NRPM 8.2. Even without a corporate reorganization? Unknown - please distinguish what you mean by a “corporate reorganization”; is this distinct from organizations which are undergoing some form of internal reorganization of functions? /John John Curran President and CEO ARIN -- _______________________________________________________ Jason Schiller|NetOps|[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>|571-266-0006
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
