From: "Matthew Wilder" <[email protected]>:
It's probably a good time to stop the Titanic reference. Sure IPv6
deployment has reached 12% globally, but my most optimistic projections
show that IPv4 is going to be relevant for a half decade more from now.
I think the Titanic sunk in less time if I'm not mistaken.
Only because we're all here talking about IPv4 policy instead of
deploying IPv6.
Transfer policies are going to be the most stable source of IPv4
addresses post-depletion so it does make good sense to have good
policies for those organizations who need it.
Why?
Organizations who need it are arguably doing something wrong. Why should
we have policies any better/different than the existing ones? More
importantly, why is changing the policies we have now a good use of
anyone's time?
Matthew Kaufman
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
