On Jun 23, 2016, at 7:58 PM, Michael Peddemors <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On 16-06-22 06:47 PM, Andrew Dul wrote:
>> The point of 8.5.2 is to clarify that the community believes that IPv4
>> addresses are to be used on operational networks, not as resources to be
>> held for some other purpose (e.g. financial speculation).  We ask that
>> an officer of the organization to attest to ensure that the organization
>> understands the nature of the transaction and doesn't commit its $ in
>> support of other goals.  I believe having it in section 8 helps
>> organizations clearly understand the requirements for transfer.  (e.g.
>> They don't have to hunt around in other sections for other
>> requirements.) I, personally, believe that the base requirement for any
>> transfer is that the organization intend to use it on an operational
>> network.
> 
> Only concern I have, is that it has no real teeth.. You can always 'make' it 
> operational, we have seen recent allotments simply rented out to spammers who 
> want virgin IP space.. boom.. now it is used/operational

Michael - 
 
   That particular case wouldn’t qualify, as they would have to detail their 
usage of
   the IP address space on their own operational networks (if there is a 
different 
   intent of the policy, the language should be changed to make that quite 
clear.) 
 
   I do believe such a provision would have significant teeth with respect to 
inhibiting
   IP address blocks as a viable large scale investment opportunity.   While 
those 
   of questionable repute may want work around such provisions, it would be 
rather
   difficult to establish a formal vehicle (i.e. fund) for investment in IP 
resource blocks 
   based on a requirement for the necessary representations and the associated 
risk 
   of loss of the entire investment in cases of fraud.   Other than that 
circumstance, 
   I agree that it would be fairly straightforward for most operating companies 
to make
   reasonable representations based on anticipated needs without significant 
concern.

Thanks!
/John

John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN

_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to