> On Nov 4, 2016, at 18:35 , David R Huberman <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
>> "ARIN will proceed with processing transfer requests even if the
>> number resources of the combined organizations EXCEED WHAT CAN BE
>> JUSTIFIED UNDER CURRENT ARIN POLICY. IN THAT EVENT, ARIN will work
>> with the resource holder(s) to transfer the extra number resources to
>> other organization(s) or accept a voluntary return of the extra number
>> resources to ARIN."
>> 
>> I don't see an "or let you keep the extra number resources' in there.
> 
> Correct. You also don't see a MUST in the context of MUST transfer or MUST 
> return.  The RSA forbids it, and the community has never given ARIN such 
> power in policy.
> 
> The AC has tried to fix this text a few times, and perhaps we haven't done a 
> good enough job.

Perhaps, in part, because some of us think that the RSA is what is broken 
rather than the language in the policy.

The intent of the community, despite the board’s and staff’s future actions to 
the contrary was that an 8.2 transfer would force signing an RSA.

Owen

_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to