I agree that 2016-6 didn't address the intent of 2016-7, and thank you for clarifying why for us, Kevin.
Under the proposed text of 2016-7, research and education networks could justifiably fall under the new definition of a community network. R&E networks are largely operated under the fiscal support of a non-profit organization or educational institution, and aim to provide the lowest cost connectivity for our R&E member base. Is there any harm associated R&E networks qualifying under those terms as well as under other policy? If the Community Networks Assignment policy in its current incarnation has never been used, is there another policy under which "community networks," besides the aforementioned R&E networks, are qualifying for and requesting IPv6 allocations, thereby rendering the provisions in 2016-7 redundant? Or have there simply been zero IPv6 requests made by community networks?
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
