Scott, On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Scott Leibrand <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> In message <[email protected]>, >> David Huberman <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >In short, there is an argument that the SWIP rules are no-op now. So to >> answer >> >your question directly; what do you do? Nothing. Those days are long gone >> >and ARIN has other focuses now. >> >> So, let me see if I understand this... >> >> ARIN doesn't, can't, and most probably won't either enforce the existing >> (IPv4) SWIP rules, nor, for that matter, any new SWIP rules that may be >> drafted and/or promulgated with respect to IPv6. Is that about the size >> of it? >> > > Pretty much, unless someone comes up with a new method of enforcing SWIP > rules. Some of the discussions with law enforcement could eventually > result in such carrots or sticks, but no one has proposed any specifics yet. > There is this draft policy that has a few "sticks" at least for delegations to downstream ISPs. https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2017_3.html > > >> >> ----Cathy
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
