In message <CAGkMwz6m67=BNTh2E=-Fe=jpdQjyBDK=_jjjl6hi+jbr6br...@mail.gmail.com>, Scott Leibrand <[email protected]> wrote:
>On the topic of "what should the threshold be", I think requiring SWIPs for >(non-residential) assignments is actually what we want here... I'd like to take this opportunity to mention again that just the other day I requested (here) at least -some- clarity or clarification of the term of art "Residential Customer", as used in the NRPM. I did so while noting that every legal entity, human or otherwise, "resides" somewhere, even if, as often seem to be the case, the relevant "residence" is just a 4x4 inch P.O. Box, rented in the name of overnight manufactured business. I repeat and reiterate that request now. What is the definition, for purposes of the ARIN NRPM, of the term "Residential Customer" and is there any limit (for either IPv4 or IPv6) on the maximum the size of an allocation made to a "Residential Customer"? I wouldn't ask, but I do believe that I've sen cases where so-called "Residential Customers" (who later turned out to be professional snowshoe spammers) had been sub-assigned blocks as large as (IPv4) /25s. Unfortuately, given the definitional ambiguity, I have no idea if such cases do or do not conform to The Rules, as already adopted. Regards, rfg _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
