Oppose as written, agree with all of Andy's points. -Austin
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 11:56 PM, Hadenfeldt, Andrew C < [email protected]> wrote: > Oppose as written, +1 on the points below (leave /29 alone, and would > prefer to see /56 rather than /60) > > > > *-Andy* > > > > *From:* ARIN-PPML [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *William > Herrin > *Sent:* Tuesday, May 23, 2017 2:02 PM > *To:* ARIN <[email protected]> > *Cc:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2017-5: Equalization of > Assignment Registration requirements between IPv4 and IPv6 > > > > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 2:35 PM, ARIN <[email protected]> wrote: > > Draft Policy ARIN-2017-5: Equalization of Assignment Registration > requirements between IPv4 and IPv6 > > Policy statement: > > Amend 4.2.3.7.1 of the policy manual to strike "/29 or more" and change to > "more than a /28". > > > > Hello, > > In my opinion... > > > > Leave /29 alone or change it to "more than a single IP address." In these > days of IPv4 shortage, substantial networks sit behind small blocks of > public addresses. These networks should be documented with reachable POCs > lest the anti-spam/virus/malware folks slam down /24 filters for lack of > information about how misbehaving networks are partitioned. > > > > Amend 6.5.5.1 of the policy manual to strike "/64 or more" and change to > "more than a /60". > > > > Change this to "more than a /56." Service providers should NOT be > assigning /64's to end users. If you're doing that, you're doing it wrong. > An IPv6 customer should be able to have more than one /64 subnet without > resorting to NAT so /60 should be the absolute minimum end-user assignment, > equivalent for all intents and purposes to an IPv4 /32. If we then want > "equivalence" to the /29 policy so that individuals with the minimum and > near-minimum assignment do not need to be SWIPed, it makes sense to move > the next subnetting level up. In IPv6, assignment is strongly recommended > on nibble boundaries, so that means /56. > > > Regards, > > Bill Herrin > > > -- > > William Herrin ................ [email protected] [email protected] > Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/> > This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the > intended recipient(s). Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or > distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please > contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original > message and any attachments. > > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. >
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
