In message <[email protected]>, Michael Peddemors <[email protected]> wrote:
>PS, what was your personal take on implementing a public reporting of >non-compliance events system, that allowed the public to see what >actions/porgress is/are being made by ARIN in requesting the >non-complying party to get into compliance? > >Seems that under the current model, other parties seem to have 'doubts' >on how effective reporting is.. For those who missed it, I already put foward an informal proposal that ARIN would/could/should simply create, on its web site, an open and public read/write forum where people could at least lodge comments about this or that specific number resource and its likely conformance to established ARIN rules, or the lack thereof. This would involve minimal time and effort on ARIN's part and, as I pointed out, also -zero- legal liability for ARIN. It would also have -zero- effect, one way or the other, upon either ARIN's current efforts to enforce the existing rules or, in the alternative, ARIN's lack thereof. Whatever ARIN is doing or not doing at the present time would be entirely unaffected by the creation of such a public forum. I can only infer that the lack of a warm reception, within the ARIN community, to this rather simple and easy idea can be largely if not entirely attributed to the community's preference for sweeping all of its dirty laundry under the carpet. (And my apologies for the mixed metaphor.) Regards, rfg _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
