On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 5:25 PM, John Curran <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 15 Jun 2017, at 5:16 PM, William Herrin <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm of the opinion that if nobody minds, it doesn't matter. Thus I'd like > to see complaint-triggered review of SWIP compliance with some kind of > "reasonable" threshold for honest error and some kind of escalating penalty > for repeat offense. Is that policy or business practice? > > > There’s substantial policy issues in that (e.g. threshold for compliance, > registry implications of penalties) that you should use the policy process > for discussion. If there is a consensus on a path forward, the ARIN AC > is quite capable of phrasing the final policy with appropriate suggestions > on specifics of implementation (e.g. fees/penalties) that the Board can > then review and ratify as appropriate. > Tempting, but I've come to feel like Charlie Brown to your Lucy the last few times I've tried so if it's all the same to you I'm going to sit here and throw peanuts from the gallery. Regards, Bill -- William Herrin ................ [email protected] [email protected] Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
