+1
That is what I agree with.
However reading the ARIN reassignment web page they are showing
policy that /60 should be SWIP'ed on IPv6 and /29 on IPv4.
Thanks you
Paul
On 7/17/2017 5:46 PM, [email protected] wrote:
The language of "b)" actually makes more sense with a /47:
Each static IPv6 assignment containing a /47 or more addresses, or
subdelegation of any size that will be individually announced, shall
be registered in the WHOIS directory via SWIP or a distributed service
which meets the standards set forth in section 3.2.
The major difference is that this language eliminates the SWIP
requirement for /48 blocks that are not announced, but all larger
blocks require SWIP, and blocks smaller than /48 are also exempt and
of course also non-routeable.
This is best for those that think SWIP should be limited to only
blocks that are individually announced. I could go either way on this
issue.
Albert Erdmann
Network Administrator
Paradise On Line Inc.
On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, Leif Sawyer wrote:
Shepherd of the draft policy chiming in.
Thanks for the lively discussion, everybody. There's certainly a
lot to think about here.
Just as a reminder to folk, the current policy under question is
located here:
https://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#six551
And, to help clarify some confusion, per 6.5.5.3.1
(https://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#six5531)
residential customers "holding/64 and larger blocks" may use
censored data, i.e. "Private Customer/Residence"
in lieu of actual names and street addresses.
--
With that said, I have a couple of questions to ask, based on
potential rewrites that are brewing.
First: Assuming a preference for /56 (based on PPML feedback)
for the moment, which is the more
preferential rewrite of the opening sentence of 6.5.5.1?
a) Each static IPv6 assignment containing a /55 or more
addresses shall be registered in the WHOIS directory via SWIP or a
distributed service which meets the standards set forth in section 3.2.
b) Each static IPv6 assignment containing a /55 or more
addresses, or subdelegation of any size that will be individually
announced, shall be registered in the WHOIS directory via SWIP or a
distributed service which meets the standards set forth in section 3.2.
Second: Given your specific choice of A or B, are you
preferentially inclined to choose the provided bit-boundary, or "/48"
Third: If none of these options are palatable, do you have a
proposed approach?
Thanks,
Leif Sawyer
Advisory Council
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
