Yes
/48 is the SWIP boundary. /48 is SWIP'ed.
/49 is not.
Paul
On 7/20/2017 3:07 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
My recommendation was “shorter than /48” which would essentially mean the same
thing.
Owen
On Jul 17, 2017, at 15:46 , hostmas...@uneedus.com wrote:
The language of "b)" actually makes more sense with a /47:
Each static IPv6 assignment containing a /47 or more addresses, or
subdelegation of any size that will be individually announced, shall be
registered in the WHOIS directory via SWIP or a distributed service which meets
the standards set forth in section 3.2.
The major difference is that this language eliminates the SWIP requirement for
/48 blocks that are not announced, but all larger blocks require SWIP, and
blocks smaller than /48 are also exempt and of course also non-routeable.
This is best for those that think SWIP should be limited to only blocks that
are individually announced. I could go either way on this issue.
Albert Erdmann
Network Administrator
Paradise On Line Inc.
On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, Leif Sawyer wrote:
Shepherd of the draft policy chiming in.
Thanks for the lively discussion, everybody. There's certainly a lot to think
about here.
Just as a reminder to folk, the current policy under question is located here:
https://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#six551
And, to help clarify some confusion, per 6.5.5.3.1
(https://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#six5531)
residential customers "holding/64 and larger blocks" may use censored data, i.e.
"Private Customer/Residence"
in lieu of actual names and street addresses.
--
With that said, I have a couple of questions to ask, based on potential
rewrites that are brewing.
First: Assuming a preference for /56 (based on PPML feedback) for the
moment, which is the more
preferential rewrite of the opening sentence of 6.5.5.1?
a) Each static IPv6 assignment containing a /55 or more addresses shall be
registered in the WHOIS directory via SWIP or a distributed service which meets
the standards set forth in section 3.2.
b) Each static IPv6 assignment containing a /55 or more addresses, or
subdelegation of any size that will be individually announced, shall be
registered in the WHOIS directory via SWIP or a distributed service which meets
the standards set forth in section 3.2.
Second: Given your specific choice of A or B, are you preferentially inclined to
choose the provided bit-boundary, or "/48"
Third: If none of these options are palatable, do you have a proposed approach?
Thanks,
Leif Sawyer
Advisory Council
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
