On 28 Sep 2017, at 11:59 PM, Alexander, Daniel
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hello All,
I just wanted to mention some procedural points to consider in this discussion
and thank you all for contributing to this debate. It does provide helpful
guidance to the AC.
The current text is frozen, and cannot be changed until it is discussed at the
meeting in San Jose. However, it can be discussed whether people would prefer
"shall" or "should". If the community wanted the AC to advance this proposal by
changing "should" to "shall", without going to another meeting, it does have to
be discussed in San Jose with clear consensus, since that is not an editorial
change.
Clear direction from the community helps the AC in their decision making
process. If the discussion and feedback at the meeting is clearly split between
changes to the text, it can make final decisions challenging.
Thank you all for your help in this process.
Dan -
Your reading of the ARIN policy development process in this regard is 100%
correct.
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
