It sounds like our recollections of what we intended for ISP initial 
allocations have diverged. I will admit when I drafted the problem statement I 
did not go back through email to see if there was anything about this issue.

Assuming we harmonize the problem statement, would you prefer the /24 as 
initial no questions asked size or a /21?

What do others prefer?

.Andrew

> On Nov 21, 2017, at 2:52 PM, Scott Leibrand <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I believe this problem statement is incorrect, and therefore oppose the 
> policy proposal as-is.
> 
> 8.5.4 was intended (by me, as one of the authors, and in PPML discussions I 
> just pulled up) to allow ISPs to transfer a /24 without justification.  It 
> was *not* intended to "match the previous policy" in 4.2.2.
> 
> 8.5.5 reads "8.5.5. Block size
> Organizations may qualify for the transfer of a larger initial block, or an 
> additional block, by providing documentation to ARIN which details the use of 
> at least 50% of the requested IPv4 block size within 24 months. An officer of 
> the organization shall attest to the documentation provided to ARIN."
> 
> The intention was that any ISP needing a /21 would need to "provide 
> documentation to ARIN which details the use of at least 50% of the requested 
> IPv4 block size within 24 months", with officer attestation to same.
> 
> If that policy is deemed insufficient, and we believe it's better to allow 
> transfers of up to /21 without providing documentation to ARIN and officer 
> attestation of such, then this proposal would need to be re-written with a 
> new problem statement justifying that.
> 
> -Scott
> 
>> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 2:40 PM, ARIN <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 16 November 2017, the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) advanced "ARIN-prop-244: 
>> Clarification of Initial Block Size for IPv4 ISP Transfers" to Draft Policy 
>> status.
>> 
>> Draft Policy ARIN-2017-9 is below and can be found at:
>> https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2017_9.html
>> 
>> You are encouraged to discuss all Draft Policies on PPML. The AC will 
>> evaluate the discussion in order to assess the conformance of this draft 
>> policy with ARIN's Principles of Internet number resource policy as stated 
>> in the Policy Development Process (PDP). Specifically, these principles are:
>> 
>> * Enabling Fair and Impartial Number Resource Administration
>> * Technically Sound
>> * Supported by the Community
>> 
>> The PDP can be found at:
>> https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html
>> 
>> Draft Policies and Proposals under discussion can be found at:
>> https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/index.html
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Sean Hopkins
>> Policy Analyst
>> American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Draft Policy ARIN-2017-9: Clarification of Initial Block Size for IPv4 ISP 
>> Transfers
>> 
>> Problem Statement:
>> 
>> It was noted at the ARIN 40 Policy Experience Report, that there is an 
>> inconsistency in the initial block size for ISPs. Section 4.2.2 notes that 
>> the initial ISP block size should be /21 whereas the initial block size in 
>> 8.5.4 is noted as "minimum transfer size" which is effectively a /24. The 
>> intent of the new 8.5.4 was to match the previous policy. This policy is 
>> intended to clarify this issue. It was noted that ARIN staff current 
>> operational practice is to allow ISPs an initial /21 for Section 8 transfers.
>> 
>> Policy statement:
>> 
>> Add the following to 8.5.4
>> 
>> ISP organizations without direct assignments or allocations from ARIN 
>> qualify for an initial allocation of up to a /21.
>> 
>> Comments:
>> 
>> a. Timetable for implementation: Immediate
>> _______________________________________________
>> PPML
>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
>> Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to