I think the burden is the potential to have to rejustify an ISP's initial allocation when being fulfilled by transfer. The inconsistency seems inefficient and creates confusion; there appears to be support for eliminating the inconsistency. With slightly more support for changing section 8 to be consistent with section 4, rather than the other way around.
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 6:07 PM, Scott Leibrand <[email protected]> wrote: > Quoting myself: > > If there are organizations transferring blocks larger than a /24 for > whom officer-attested justification is burdensome (to them or to ARIN) I’d > like to understand what is burdensome, so we can figure out how to reduce > that burden. If not, then implementing section 8 as written seems > appropriate until we identify a reason to change it. > > > Do you know of any organizations transferring blocks larger than a /24 > for whom officer-attested justification is burdensome (to them or to ARIN)? > > Scott > -- =============================================== David Farmer Email:[email protected] Networking & Telecommunication Services Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 ===============================================
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
