John, So an ISP with no resources who wanted an initial /21 from ARIN would be asked for some additional data to ensure that the /21 was not more than an 90 day supply?
__Jason On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 1:53 PM, John Curran <[email protected]> wrote: > On 25 Jan 2018, at 5:17 AM, Jason Schiller <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > The argument (as I understand it) is comparing justification > > required for a transfer vs for ARIN free pool. > > > > If ARIN does not permit a "no justification" approval > > for a transfer of a /21 under ISP initial allocation > > if they have no direct resources then, > > > > There are extra requirements on transfers that > > did not exist on getting that same approval for a /21 > > from the free pool. > > > > My understanding is that there is a restriction > > on the ISP initial allocation from the free pool. > > It was show that this is not more than a 90 day > > supply. We changed that to two years. > > > > My understanding is that ISPs with no direct IPv4 > > didn't get a free pass on the (then) 90 day restriction > > when asking for their initial /21. > > 2009-8 (which added the 90 restriction on ISP initial allocations) > indicated "This reduction does not apply to resources received via section > 8.3.”, and therefore it is inappropriate to take it into consideration when > comparing allocation policy against transfer policy as it was never > indicated to apply with respect to transfers. > > Thanks, > /John > > John Curran > President and CEO > ARIN > > > -- _______________________________________________________ Jason Schiller|NetOps|[email protected]|571-266-0006
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
