Correction…

APNIC and RIPE already have policy to support this process with no utilization.

Owen


> On Aug 13, 2018, at 16:03 , Mike Burns <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> I support the policy and note that:
> 
> The costs to implement are practically zero.
> Some community members have requested this ability, who are we to gainsay 
> their reasons?
> The changes to the NRPM are tiny and discrete.
> No downsides to the implementation this policy have been offered in any 
> comments, if the need is tiny, so is ARIN staff time expended.
> APNIC and RIPE are already engaged in this process with no ill effects.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Mike
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---- On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 19:00:28 -0400 Steven Ryerse 
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote 
> ----
> 
> +1
>  
>  
> Steven Ryerse
> President
> 100 Ashford Center North, Suite 110, Atlanta, GA  30338
> 770.656.1460 - Cell
> 770.399.9099 - Office
> 770.392.0076 - Fax
>  
> <1.jpg>℠ Eclipse Networks, Inc.
>         Conquering Complex Networks℠
>  
> From: ARIN-PPML <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> On Behalf Of Scott Leibrand
> Sent: Monday, August 13, 2018 6:52 PM
> To: Job Snijders <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Cc: ARIN-PPML List <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-2018-1: Allow Inter-regional ASN Transfers
> 
>  
> If you operate a network with peering sessions, and you are forced to 
> renumber your ASN, you either need to convince all of your peers to set up 
> new sessions (which can be a lot of work, and usually means at least some of 
> them will refuse/fail to do so), or you need to local-as prepend the old ASN 
> onto your new one, resulting in a longer AS path over that session.  Both 
> outcomes are disruptive to a network's ability to maintain peering.
>  
> Given that there are valid technical and business justifications for needing 
> to keep the same ASN on a network whose locus of control switches continents, 
> I believe it is appropriate to allow organizations who need to do so to 
> transfer administrative control of their ASN between RIRs, and therefore 
> support this draft policy.
>  
> While it is certainly possible for some networks to easily renumber their 
> ASN, that is not true of all networks, for valid technical reasons.  I 
> therefore do not find arguments of the "I've never needed to do that" or "I 
> can't imagine why someone would need to do that" informative or convincing.  
> To my mind, the only argument that would justify opposing ASN transfers would 
> be one that details how such transfers would be burdensome to the RIRs or to 
> the Internet community more generally, and would further show that such 
> burden is greater than the benefit to those organizations it would help.  As 
> I, Job, and others have detailed the kind of organization that would be 
> benefited by this proposal, it's not sufficient to assert that such 
> organization do not (or should not) exist.
>  
> -Scott
>  
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 3:36 PM Job Snijders <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 at 01:23, Larry Ash <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 14:47:09 -0700
>   Owen DeLong <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >> On Aug 13, 2018, at 14:42 , Job Snijders <[email protected] 
> >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >> 
> >> I agree with the proposal.
> >> 
> >> I think this proposal is needed and addresses practical concerns: the 
> >> alternative to transfers is “renumbering”, and renumbering 
> >>ASNs is a very costly and operationally risky proposition. There is no 
> >>upside to restricting or forbidding this type of resource 
> >>transfer.
> >> 
> >> A question that remains: if you don’t want to transfer your ASN in or out 
> >> of ARIN, then don’t, but why forbid others from doing 
> >>it? All resources should be transferable.
> > 
> > We can agree to disagree.
> 
> I agree with Owen, I just can't see a burning need. Renumbering seems to be a 
> bugaboo that is just not that difficult.
> 
>  
> Even if you don’t see a need, would you want to preclude others from 
> transferring their resource if they concluded it is a requirement for their 
> business operation?
>  
>  
> I would think the transfer of the ASN would as costly, difficult and risky as 
> migrating the resources onto a new ASN.
>  
>  
> I’m puzzled by your statement. Renumbering an ASN may involve operations on 
> hundreds of routers and tens of thousands of BGP sessions - such renumbering 
> clearly is costly and operationally risky.
>  
> Transferring a resource from one RIR to another RIR is paperwork between RIRs 
> - no router changes. A transfer and a renumbering don’t seem comparable at 
> all. Do you consider IPv4 transfers costly and risky too?
>  
> Kind regards,
>  
> Job
> _______________________________________________
> ARIN-PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml 
> <https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml>
> Please contact [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you experience any 
> issues.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ARIN-PPML 
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to 
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>). 
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: 
> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml 
> <https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml> 
> Please contact [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you experience any 
> issues. 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ARIN-PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.

_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to