> On Oct 4, 2018, at 11:10 AM, John Curran <[email protected]> wrote: > ARIN had been inconsistent in our approach to ... DNSSEC services over the > years.
There is no room for inconsistency in the application of security.
You’re entirely missing Michael’s point. DNSSEC is not a _treat_ that you
dangle in front of universities, it’s an operational requirement for _the whole
Internet_, of which your paying members are constituents. You’re denying _me_
the ability to use DNSSEC to validate addresses any time you prevent anyone
from registering a DS record.
-Bill
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
