For me the financial price is too high *and* I didn't want to be on the wrong side when someone decided they might be a real asset.
Now that I've whittled my holdings down to what I need for my own purposes, it is just financial, like Brian. ps. That's also why I haven't moved these networks to PI IPv6 space. On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 12:09 PM Matthew Kaufman <[email protected]> wrote: > Ever since the "legacy resource holders get the same services that they > received upon ARIN’s formation" we knew it was only a matter of time before > some new-but-now-critical service (RPKI, DNSSEC, addition of some required > new Whois field, etc.) was denied to them. The "stick" part of the "carrot > and stick" approach to getting people to sign a service agreement. > > The addresses I use are not under a service agreement, and I will continue > to use them, (and fight for them to be fully usable no matter what new > features become mandatory for a registrar to support against an address > block for the operator community to route or otherwise accept that block) > without such agreement, to communicate on the Internet. > > Matthew Kaufman > > > On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 11:28 AM Paul Andersen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Bill, >> >> I am personally fully committed to universal DNSSEC, and I believe that >> this practice deleteriously affects all ARIN members, not just legacy ones. >> I hope that discussion on this list will indicate a clear community >> consensus, so that the board can ensure that staff act upon that input. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Paul >> >> >> > On Oct 4, 2018, at 2:00 PM, Bill Woodcock <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> >> On Oct 4, 2018, at 9:29 AM, Michael Sinatra < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> I have received word of an apparent change in ARIN operational >> policy... >> >> ...no longer accepting DNSSEC DS records for reverse DNS for those >> resources that are not covered by RSA or LRSA. This is a change from >> current operational practice, and it effectively disables the *community's* >> ability to validate reverse DNS for these holders. >> > >> > This is an unconscionable roll-back of a critical security feature of >> the Internet. This cannot be allowed to move forward. >> > >> > -Bill >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > ARIN-PPML >> > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to >> > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). >> > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: >> > https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml >> > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ARIN-PPML >> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to >> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). >> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: >> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml >> Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. >> >
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
