Please cite an example of this. I do not believe that to be the case for IPv6 in any RIR.
Owen > On Mar 27, 2019, at 07:15 , JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ARIN-PPML > <[email protected]> wrote: > > In some RIRs, the policies only allow you to use the addresses (or most of > them), in that region. > > Regards, > Jordi > > > > El 27/3/19 13:38, "ARIN-PPML en nombre de Roberts, Orin" > <[email protected] en nombre de [email protected]> escribió: > > Opposed - the simple view. > > Why is the need for an IPv6 "Inter-regional" policy justifiable? > > IPv6 addresses are/were meant to be used in global architecture by design; > I remember an early selling feature being the scope for inter-planetary > expansion. > Therefore, the five RIR's should only have policies for equitable > distribution based on the technicality and legalities of their various zones. > > In my opinion, once distributed, those addresses should default back to > IANA to manage under a single global policy. The RIR's can then continue to > manage the distribution/routing records on behalf of IANA. > > It seems to me, that by placing policy restrictions on IPv6 addresses, we > are saddling this wonderful protocol with IPv4 design limitations. > > Orin Roberts > Bell Canada > > > -----Original Message----- > From: ARIN-PPML <[email protected]> On Behalf Of > [email protected] > Sent: March-26-19 6:23 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2019-4: Allow Inter-regional > IPv6 Resource Transfers > > I am opposed. > > IPv6 policies have been designed from the beginning to limit the growth of > the global routing tables. Policies such as sparse assignment help with this > goal, as well as the development of means to renumber with relative ease, > compared to IPv4. This is because more than one upstream can be advertised > at the same time and in the same network. A RFC compliant host will by > default assign addresses in each subnet that it hears router advertisements > and spread its outgoing traffic between the available upstream routers. > Unlike IPv4, we are nowhere near exhaust, and there is no need to get into > the legacy transfer issue with IPv6. I would perfer to allow each IPv6 block > assigned to a RIR to remain 100% under the control of that RIR. If transfers > are possible, this fact alone can be used to defeat the trust anchor. > > It is unclear to me what the trust anchor problem actually is, and why it > needs to lead to the explosion of the IPv6 DFZ because of transfers. If > there is an issue of ARIN policy regarding trust anchors compared to other > RIR's, this policy should instead be addressed instead of allowing transfers > as a work around to a bad ARIN policy. > > Ideally, IPv6 blocks should be obtained from the upstream ISP/LIR and they > should be routed to the default route, with only one route per ISP/LIR. > Since the "normal" site assignment is a /48, unlike IPv4, there is no > shortage of address space for any use without involvement of ARIN or other > RIR. If one needs to be multihomed, each host can have an address from each > available upstream, providing availability to each host from more than one > network. > > Albert Erdmann > Network Administrator > Paradise On Line Inc. > > On Tue, 26 Mar 2019, ARIN wrote: > >> On 21 March 2019, the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) accepted "ARIN-prop-263: >> Allow Inter-regional IPv6 Resource Transfers" as a Draft Policy. >> >> The Draft Policy text is below and can be found at: >> https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/2019_4/ >> >> You are encouraged to discuss all Draft Policies on PPML. The AC will >> evaluate the discussion in order to assess the conformance of this >> draft policy with ARIN's Principles of Internet number resource policy >> as stated in the Policy Development Process (PDP). Specifically, these >> principles are: >> >> * Enabling Fair and Impartial Number Resource Administration >> * Technically Sound >> * Supported by the Community >> >> The PDP can be found at: >> https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/pdp/ >> >> Draft Policies and Proposals under discussion can be found at: >> https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/ >> >> Regards, >> >> Sean Hopkins >> Policy Analyst >> American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN) >> >> >> >> Draft Policy ARIN-2019-4: Allow Inter-regional IPv6 Resource Transfers >> >> Problem Statement: >> >> There is an operational need to allow RIR transfers of IPv6 resources >> between RIRs with an equivalent transfer policy. ARIN’s RPKI Trust >> Anchor (TA) is measurably less widely deployed than TAs from other >> RIRs. As a consequence, RPKI ROAs published through ARIN offer less >> value. Operators seeking to extract the most value from their >> investment in IPv6 would benefit from the ability to transfer IPv6 >> resources to RIRs with more widely deployed RPKI Trust Anchors. >> >> Policy Statement: >> >> Change the first sentence in section 8.4 from: >> >> “Inter-regional transfers of IPv4 number resources and ASNs may take >> place only via RIRs who agree to the transfer and share reciprocal, >> compatible needs-based policies.” >> >> To: >> >> “Inter-regional transfers of Internet number resources may take place >> only via RIRs who agree to the transfer and share reciprocal, >> compatible needs-based policies.” >> >> Comments: >> >> Timetable for implementation: Immediate >> _______________________________________________ >> ARIN-PPML >> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN >> Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). >> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: >> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml >> Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. >> > _______________________________________________ > ARIN-PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. > > > > > ********************************************** > IPv4 is over > Are you ready for the new Internet ? > http://www.theipv6company.com > The IPv6 Company > > This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or > confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the > individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, > copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if > partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be > considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware > that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this > information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly > prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the > original sender to inform about this communication and delete it. > > > > _______________________________________________ > ARIN-PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
