Regarding the proposed text:
“These allocations will be no smaller than a /48.”
I would strongly recommend avoiding terms "smaller" or "larger" when
describing address allocation sizes by prefix-length, always using the
unambiguous "longer" or "shorter" instead.
Thanks.
Jay B.
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
