I think your point is well taken. I think you are suggesting the changes should instead be;
“These allocations will be no longer than a /48.” That still seems like an editorial change to me. Thanks. On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 11:54 AM Jay Borkenhagen <[email protected]> wrote: > Regarding the proposed text: > > “These allocations will be no smaller than a /48.” > > I would strongly recommend avoiding terms "smaller" or "larger" when > describing address allocation sizes by prefix-length, always using the > unambiguous "longer" or "shorter" instead. > > Thanks. > Jay B. > > > _______________________________________________ > ARIN-PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. > -- =============================================== David Farmer Email:[email protected] Networking & Telecommunication Services Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 ===============================================
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
