Hi,
It's not really an issue about the "global routing system".
If an hijacker has a set of "target networks" and finds all of them in the
same NAP/IXP, he just needs to join and inject the hijacks through the
NAP/IXP, without any upstream involved.
The problem here is effective use of other people's resources without
proper autorization from the owner. If someone (outside the routing plane)
tries to sell/transfer a block it doesn't hold, that can also be
considered as an hijack, right?
Regards,
Carlos
On Thu, 2 May 2019, John Curran wrote:
On May 2, 2019, at 12:19 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ARIN-PPML
<[email protected]> wrote:
I think this is part of the reason it has been declared out-of-scope. The
misunderstanding about ?speaking of routing?. Is not the case, we are speaking
about members should respect the exclusive right of use of other members.
Hijacking with BGP is only the mean to break that right.
Jordi -
That ?right of use? you reference is a ?right of use within the registry?, at
least with respect to ARIN. We cannot provide a right to ?use within the
global routing system? without our customers first agreeing to contractual
responsibilities that do not presently exist (as ARIN has no control over the
global routing system.)
Thanks!
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
American Registry for Internet Numbers
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
