> Owen DeLong wrote: > IPv6 unicast addresses were allocated to ARIN for allocation and assignment. > The addresses were in ARIN inventory and there was an erroneous view that > IETF had authority to dictate registration policy for those addresses.
That was definitely not the view of the IETF. I can remember some private discussions that were not exactly politically correct. You did good on that one, we were so stuck into that multi6 mess. > David Farmer wrote : > If you are a believer in IPv4-Only I'm not a believer of anything, I just do whatever I can or must. I'm leaning that way tough, because I'm getting tired of people trying to shove IPv6 down my throat when I can't afford it. I have DECNET on my production network. I have HPUX, VMS, Netware, OS/2 Warp, and any flavor of Linux and Windows you can name. I have T1s. I don’t get to pick what's on the network, I just have to make it work. I know what IPv6 is. I was on the 6bone. I hate to break it to you, but at $job[0], it's not even on the agenda. We are heading straight towards the balkanization of the Internet. Michel _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
