Is this transitive? I.E. Org A gets a 4.1.8.2. Org B acquires Org A
and under 8.2 keeps the 4.1.8.2 resources. Does the restriction that
they can only be transferred to Org C via 8.2 still apply? (I think it
should, but IANAL, and I think this needs to be worded carefully to
avoid opening up a loophole.)
On 5/21/2019 04:07 PM, William Herrin wrote:
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 11:06 AM ARIN <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Draft Policy ARIN-2019-14: No Specified Transfers for 4.1.8.2 Blocks
Policy Statement:
Add a second paragraph to 4.1.8.2 <http://4.1.8.2>:
IP allocations issued through 4.1.8.2 are non-transferable via section
8.3 and section 8.4. In the case of a section 8.2, transfer of the IP
assignment must be utilized for the same purpose or needs justified
used
for the original 4.1.8 application.
Too weak.
"Organizations holding number resources issued through 4.1.8.2 shall be
eligible to transfer IPv4 addresses to another organization only as
allowed by section 8.2."
Regards,
Bill Herrin
--
William Herrin
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://bill.herrin.us/
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
--
John Santos
Evans Griffiths & Hart, Inc.
781-861-0670 ext 539
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
