Hi Owen,


The plain inference that my opinion is based on my brokering is ad hominem.

However, I will allow it! ;-)



Regards,
Mike






---- On Tue, 28 May 2019 22:52:13 -0400 Owen DeLong <[email protected]> wrote ----



Mike,



Yes and no. I believe that the lack of legacy holders for any blocks issued 
under 4.1.8 reduces the need for the market.



Defunct organizations can easily be reclaimed in this space because they stop 
paying their ARIN bill.



Eliminating the resale value of these addresses won’t really encourage 
squatting on them and limiting the size of organization and size of block that 
can benefit from 4.1.8 further helps to reduce the potential for hoarding.



I realize that as a broker, any address that can’t be monetized is a lost 
opportunity for your organization, but I think there’s plenty of addresses out 
there that haven’t been processed through 4.1.8, so I don’t think limiting the 
resale potential of such blocks to reduce fraud is a bad idea.



Owen





On May 28, 2019, at 12:46 , Mike Burns <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:



The percentages of blocks transferred takes a significant leap at the /19 size.

Below that, the percentages are all below 7%.

At /19 and above, the percentages are all above 21%.

Seems like a natural demarcation for maximum block size, but prices do continue 
to rise.

While we want to fight fraud, we should still remember the underlying reasons 
for the Ipv4 transfer market apply to these addresses as well.

That is, the market provides incentives for efficient use and accurate 
registration.

 

Regards,
Mike
 

 

 

 

From: ARIN-PPML <mailto:[email protected]> On Behalf Of John Curran
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2019 1:53 PM
To: ARIN-PPML List <mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [arin-ppml] Waiting List IPv4 blocks transferred after issuance
Importance: High


 

Folks - 


 


It occurred to me that it might be useful to have a quick summary of waiting 
list blocks issued and subsequently transferred. 


 


Attached is the distribution (count per prefix size) of all blocks that have 
been issued via ARIN's waiting list policy and subsequently transferred via 
NRPM 8.2/8.3/8.4 policy.


 


FYI,


/John


 


John Curran


President and CEO


American Registry for Internet Numbers



 


 


 


<image001.png>



_______________________________________________

ARIN-PPML

You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to

the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (mailto:[email protected]).

Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:

https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml

Please contact mailto:[email protected] if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to