> Michel Py wrote : > What I had in mind is that both the broker and the seller, while in the > process > of a transfer, each report separately the amount of the transaction.
This is not what I had in mind. Correction : What I had in mind is that both the broker and the seller^H^H^H^H^H^H BUYER, while in the process of a transfer, each report separately the amount of the transaction. Because it has come in private, a word of the 44.192/10 transaction : I think that not disclosing the amount of the transaction was a mistake. Math done fast : 4 Million IPs worth $15 a pop = $60 Million. What if it was sold for $55M or $65M ? would not have raised eyebrows. Within market fluctuations. Would have been contained to a Ham radio issue. Nobody doubts that Amazon would have forked 60 Million bucks for a block that size; they have the cash in hand. With the amount of the transaction not being public, not only everyone wonders if the sale of 44.192/8 was legit, but also why the amount was kept private. If it can't be disclosed, there must be catch, right ? Disclosing the amount of the transaction would have removed the question that's on everyone's mind : where's the catch. Michel. _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
