On 11/6/2019 12:57 PM, ARIN wrote:
This policy attempts to address these issues, by raising the minimum
size to a /24 and limits total amount an organization can receive to a
/21. It also removes the requirement for return and renumber, since that
was primarily added to allow organizations to obtain larger blocks if
that was necessary. The policy also clarifies the utilization
requirements by placing them directly in this section rather than a
reference to the utilization requirements of end users.
Policy Statement:
Replace current 4.10 with the following updated section
4.10 Dedicated IPv4 block to facilitate IPv6 Deployment
ARIN shall allocate a contiguous /10 from its last /8 IPv4 allocation
from IANA. This IPv4 block will be set aside and dedicated to facilitate
IPv6 deployment. Allocations and assignments from this block must be
justified by immediate IPv6 deployment requirements. Examples of such
needs include: IPv4 addresses for key dual stack DNS servers, and NAT-PT
or NAT464 translators. ARIN staff will use their discretion when
evaluating justifications.
This block will be subject to a minimum and maximum size allocation of
/24. ARIN should use sparse allocation when possible within that /10 block.
This contradicts the statement above that the maximum allocation or
assignment is a /21, not a /24. Or is it intended that the initial
allocation or assignment is always a /24, but the recipient can later
ask for more, up to a /21, with appropriate justification?
Or is it worded that way so that if an applicant comes back for a second
(or subsequent) allocation/assignment under this section (for a second
discrete network?) they may receive no more than a /21 in total?
Also, if the allocation or assignment is a /24, no more and no less,
what is the point of the 2nd sentence that ARIN should use sparse
allocation? Is it so applicants taking a second dip will, if possible,
get a contiguous /24 each time?
In order to receive an allocation or assignment under this policy:
- the applicant may not have received resources under this policy in the
preceding six months and cannot receive more than a /21 under this
policy section;
- previous allocations/assignments under this policy must continue to
meet the justification requirements of this policy;
- previous allocations/assignments under this policy must be utilized to
at least 80% to obtain an additional allocation or assignment;
- the applicant must demonstrate that no other allocations or
assignments will meet this need.
Timetable for Implementation: Immediate
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
--
John Santos
Evans Griffiths & Hart, Inc.
781-861-0670 ext 539
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
