On the operators using DoD space? Too bad. It happened on 23/8 to me and many times. I would get a call and was asked to "make an exception" and let someone use a subnet or three while they "figured out what to do". Why would I or anyone subsidize another network operator? o_0 I received the space because I had need. Which means I didn't have the option to turn a blind eye. Someone buying address space should be in exactly that position or why would/could they buy it? Just as ARIN can't set policy to stop squatting, squatters have no rights.
Cheers, -M< On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 4:05 PM Michel Py < [email protected]> wrote: > > Ca By > > Also, the language requiring the DoD to move has been removed from the > bill. > > Likely because relevant budget organs of government explained how it is > fiscally > > impossible to get to ipv6 for them. You can search this archive for one > M. Py > > for a template of what they may say about running old systems. > > I'm surprised this made it this far, actually. This displeases too many > groups : > It displeases the IPv6 zealots who see in it another way to keep IPv4 > rolling. > It displeases the IPv4 zealots who are perfectly happy with their monopoly. > It displeases the operators who have been using DoD space as Industry > Standard Squat Space. > > Michel. > _______________________________________________ > ARIN-PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. >
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
